Our standard prices are based on a 6 month membership commitment. For
any membership less than six months, we charge 20% more. If you pay
for your entire 6 month membership up front, we give a 15% discount on
the standard price. If you pay for an entire year up front, we give a
25% discount. We used to also charge less for a year-long commitment
(without needing to pay it up front), but stopped just for the sake of
keeping things simpler (and there's still an argument for simplifying
it more).

We provide discounts for both long-term commitments and for paying up
front for several reasons:

1) Cash flow. This only applies to the long-term memberships where the
people pay up front. It's nice to have the money now as we're a young
business and need the money to pay bills. As the space grows in the
future, that lost future income is not so crucial.

2) For better and for worse, financial gain: People who sign a long-
term contract are much more likely to stick with the space than those
who don't. Even if they don't stick with using the space, most of them
keep paying according to their contract, playing a big role in my
ability to keep prices as low as they are and stay in business. The
incentive for paying for it all up front adds to this, since that
group always pays for the entire term of the contract, while some
small percentage of members who commit long-term but don't pay it all
up front don't ever end up paying.

3) I prefer longer-term members for the sake of the community, and so
giving an incentive for a longer commitment seems to make sense.

4) Paperwork and associated time: I need to spend a great deal less
time on paperwork and organization on members who renew every year
than I do on members who renew every month.

5) It allows us to charge lower prices (for longer term commitments)
than we would otherwise be able to charge, making the space more
accessible to a lot of people who wouldn't otherwise be able to afford
it. This is important to me since part of my motive for creating this
kind of business was to help graduate students and people venturing
into freelancing for the first time, people who often can't afford a
lot for a workspace, and only with something like this (along with a
strong incentive for hotdesking over anchor desking) can I keep the
prices low enough.

6) Fair pricing: We reward contracts that make the space more
economically sustainable. To me it's a no-brainer that a 12 month
commitment adds more net income to the space (per month) than a one
month commitment (on average). If a long-term commitment is more
valuable to the space owner and more costly to the members, why charge
the same for each type of commitment?

There are some down sides, too, of course: Primarily related to # 2 &
#6: The business model creates incentives for me as a business owner
that I don't want: as with a gym model, the hope that people who
commit long-term don't end up using the space as much as they'd
planned when they signed up so that I can get more members per desk.
That's directly contrary to my main mission of helping people do their
work-related best. Also, if members are unhappy after they'd worked
here for a while, it's a shame if they feel locked in to something
they don't want. And it's bad for me to have someone locked into a
long-term contract who may be detracting from the quality of the
space. It makes it a LOT easier to tell a member that they're not the
right kind of person for the space if their contract expires at the
end of the month than if it expires in 8 months.

I get around most of the downsides, or try to get around them, by
reminding myself of the mixed motives as much as I can, keeping them
explicit so the wrong reasons (given my own reasons for doing this)
don't start to guide my actions or thinking. I don't push the long-
term memberships and I'll let people out of it with reasonable
penalties if they have a good reason for wanting to get out of the
contract or if they're detracting from the quality of the space.

Overall, it has worked great, IMO, and it's something I have found
almost zero reason to consider changing so far. I often wonder why so
many coworking spaces seem committed to charging the same for month-to-
month memberships as it seems to me to make so little sense from a
cost/profit perspective, and I don't see the difference in pricing as
contrary to coworking values. The members like the option (I couldn't
offer those lower prices if it wasn't tied to the longer-term
commitment), and it add cash flow and revenue that makes coworking
more economically sustainable.

Will

On Apr 22, 11:34 pm, Tom Brandt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm curious why you are considering this?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Wes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We've been flirting with the idea of switching to, or at least
> > including, an annual membership model at The coIN Loft. I did a quick
> > search and didn't see any discussions about it here. Has anyone tried
> > it before?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Coworking" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>
> --
> twb
> member, Workantile <http://workantile.com/>
> @twbrandt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

Reply via email to