Thanks Leon for your reply and I compaired the link you sent with the article printed in magazine and its same!!!!
Anyway I also cheked the other links you sent they look good... I actually wanted to know the meaning of that all crap in simple english words since I'm totally new to perl... all things went over my head.
Anyway thanks again.



Leon Brocard wrote:
Tushar Gokhale sent the following bits through the ether:


"I can clearly see its disadvantage (convoluted semanitc, absence of coroutines, inability to use pipes for connecting loops and subroutines like in ksh93) "


Well, this sounds like nonsense to me. Seems like it was taken from:

  http://www.softpanorama.org/People/scripting_guants.shtml

(see the second paragraph). Perl's got very good pipes, thank you very
much, and I don't think you can really compare a shell language with a
scripting language.

Anyway, this is cpan-discuss, and if you've already seen

  perldoc perlipc

Then maybe might like to have a look at the following for subprocesses
and pipes:

  http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-Run/
or
  http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-Run3/

Regards, Leon



Reply via email to