Since you changed the mailing list of the conversation, it might be good for you to start from the beginning with a blank e-mail so that people aren't confused by the other conversation we were having on cpan-testers-discuss. I'm not on the cpan-discuss mailing list, so I'm not sure why you're trying to have a conversation with me at the same time you're having a separate conversation with them. I've told you all I know about the subject, and this is not the cpan-testers-discuss list.
Doug Bell d...@preaction.me > On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Linda A. Walsh <perl-didd...@tlinx.org> wrote: > > forwarding this to cpan-discuss, for issue about 'search.cpan.org' website. > > Doug Bell wrote: >>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote: >>> >>> ...given that this discussion was redirected to the module-authors group, >>> maybe this discussion belongs there (nope). >>> >> It is confusing, yes, since the integration is good enough to appear >> seamless, but search.cpan.org is just consuming an API that cpanratings >> provides. ---- >> > That's the rub (since this topic died in discussion, again, I'm raising it in > hopes that someone on the tester's list will raising it > > >> For better or worse, there's a whole ecosystem of different websites that >> provide information on CPAN distributions, but that's not important to the >> question of "Where do I send a bug report or feature request for >> cpanratings?" >> > The issue of fixing something in cpan ratings is a different issue. > The original report was intending to fix "search.cpan.org"'s use > of the data, at all -- not that the data needs to be corrected. > > >> It doesn't really belong there either. You've got to talk to the people >> running cpanratings, and they've provided an e-mail and a Github issue >> tracker to do so. >> > --- > Nope -- the decision and placement of the ratings displayed on search.cpan.org > is in the code for 'search.cpan.org', not cpanratings. What would go into > what is included would be the perview of cpanratings, but I'm trying, at this > point, to get the ratings displayed on "search.cpan.ratings" removed until > whatever needs to be fixed w/old and outdated and inappropriate reviews is > fixed. > That removal happens on the search.cpan.ratings website which no one seems to > know a venue for. > > Does anyone know who is in charge of search.cpan.ratings to tell them > to stop including the problematic code from another site(cpanratings)? Once > the issues with cpanratings are fixed, they can then be inculded > on the search site, but for now, it's like the NYT, including a > regular feed from from a news-rating site that features > South African propaganda. > > Until the 3rd-party news-rating site fixes their algorithms to weed > out the undesired propaganda, the NYT shouldn't be running their ratings > feed along with every article.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
