On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 05:08:56PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > > > Ultimately, I wonder if we can patch CPANPLUS to use CPAN::Reporter > > and consolidate the logic, reporting, etc. Or, more likely, actually > > start refactoring CPAN::Reporter into the components of > > CPAN::Testers::*. > > I would prefer the latter, so CPANPLUS only needs to plug in to it, and > doesn't need to upgrade everytime we need to change the reporting logic. > Jos is planning to be in Oslo, so that would be a good chance to get his > thoughts on it.
I was planning on talking to Jos about it in Oslo -- figure out the best approach. I'm not sure what you mean by not having to upgrade, though. You mean just by taking the logic out of CPANPLUS? > That would be a good idea :) Even if CPANPLUS doesn't hook into the > CPAN::Testers::* code, I'd like YACSmoke to in the interim. YACSmoke > could then worry purely about the logic of testing, retesting, etc. Even though you can't make it, if you can contribute ideas to the wiki or check #perlqa during Oslo, that woudl be great. David
