On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Martin Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sincerely hope I am misunderstanding the comment "Returning 0 without > having accomplished the primary goal of the Makefile.PL, to generate a make > file, seems like a serious error/bug" because I only changed my Makefile.PL > to do exactly that (exit with 0 without generating a Makefile) at this lists > advice. I also included build_requires, configure_requires etc etc etc in > the hope of getting successful reports. Please tell me I've misunderstood > the above comment because I don't think it is fair on module authors to > continually expect them to make changes that don't stand the test of time.
Some people have philosophical objections to the "exit 0" trick. I don't think that trick will be reversed, but we might try to be smarter for those who object to using it. So I don't think you'll need to change things yet again. We're not that cruel. ;-) David
