# from CPAN Tester Report Server # on Friday 12 September 2008 19:42: >File-Fu-v0.0.4: >- i86pc-solaris-thread-multi-64int / 5.10.0: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2201908 >- i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld / 5.8.8: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2201839
Would it be possible for this to say: - i86pc-solaris-thread-multi-64int / 5.10.0 / chris: - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2201908 - i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld / 5.8.8 / chris: - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2201839 This would make it at least easier to decide which of the huge pile of fails are worth reading until things can be organized further. >Module-Build-0.2808_04: >- i386-freebsd / 5.6.2: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2202134 >- i386-freebsd-64int / 5.8.8: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2202382 >- i386-netbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.6.2: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2200343 >- i386-netbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.8.1: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2200373 >- i386-netbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.8.4: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2200415 >- i386-netbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.8.3: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2200400 >- i386-netbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.8.2: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2200383 >- darwin-thread-multi-64int-2level / 5.8.6: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2199548 >- darwin-thread-multi-64int-2level / 5.8.8: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2199597 >- darwin-thread-multi-64int / 5.6.2: > - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2199442 Ugh. I spot-checked a couple and I think they're all from chris, but the first two at least had no useful information. I mentioned before that I would like to be able to characterize reports by configuration. Do you see why? If there is some useful report in that bunch, I'm going to have a hard time finding it. I know things are moving forward and I'm very glad. I'm just pointing out (in what little time I have) what it looks like from over here. Thanks, Eric -- A counterintuitive sansevieria trifasciata was once literalized guiltily. --Product of Artificial Intelligence --------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com ---------------------------------------------------
