On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:33:34 +0100, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> > >>>>> said: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:28:17AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >> > >> Do we have departed from old numbering and NNTP compatibility > >> intentionally? > > > Yes. > > > The NNTP ID is now held in the GUID. The ID you are using to reference > > the report on www.cpantesters.org is completely unrelated to the NNTP > > ID. > > This breaks analysis.cpantesters.org. I've shut it down now. > > Please communicate what has changed and how others are supposed to > follow the new data streams.
The guid, which is in the cpanstats database is used to reference the NNTPID via David's CPAN::Testers::Common::Utils module. However, the ID in the cpanstats database is the one used on www.cpantesters.org to reference the correct report. This is necessary as shortly we will have two feed points, NNTP and the Metabase. The former is to be switched off. Soon the GUID will be the unique reference on www.cpantesters.org. This is currently being worked on, and I hope to have it live within the next few days. You can then take the NNTPID you currently have & turn it into a GUID using David's module above. Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
