On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 04:54:58PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote: > > Having said that I wonder whether the installer/smokebot is at fault > > with the non-Win32 testing. In CPANPLUS there is a specific check to > > flag any OS specific distributions as NA if on another OS. In these > > FAIL cases they are all running CPAN-Reporter-1.1711 and variants of > > CPAN-1.94XX. Is there a similar check in CPAN/CPAN-Reporter? > > I fundamentally disagree with those kind of heuristics, which is why I > haven't implemented them in CPAN::Reporter.
Why? If an OS specific distribution fails on an OS it isn't meant for a NA report is the correct one. Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
