The CPAN PASS Matrix for OpenGL is still
inconsistent with the actual information.

It appears that in addition to the builder
being 2+ days behind that the previously
determined information is not maintained.

For example, http://pass.cpantesters.org/distro/O/OpenGL.html
only release 0.57 is reported.  I just now
realized that the missing reports are all
since I took over releases for OpenGL.

Does that suggest what might be going on
with the update inconsistency?

Cheers,
Chris

On 7/19/2011 3:28 PM, Chris Marshall wrote:
OK, I was mainly concerned about the inconsistencies
between the different sections of the report.

Thanks,
Chris

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Barbie<bar...@missbarbell.co.uk>  wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:47:01AM -0400, Chris Marshall wrote:
I'm not sure what is going on but the cpan testers reports
for the Perl CHM/OpenGL-0.64_004.tar.gz seems to be
hung.  If I go to:

   http://www.cpantesters.org/distro/O/OpenGL.html#OpenGL-0.64

then the PASS Summary matrix at the top doesn't even
include any of the current releases or the latest official
release 0.64.  If I select for 0.64_004 specifically, no reports
show under Selected Reports either.

I have submitted 2-3 reports for 0.64_004 of my own
and they have not shown up either.  Is something up
with the server?

I need to preface this with the fact that Metabase is currently 24 hours

behind (we have seen a huge volume of reports submitted in the last few
weeks) and the builder is 2 days behind (but catching up).

Due to the way the builder and sync works, it can currently take
some time to see the full list of reports on the site. With the catchup
at the moment, I'm hoping it should become almost realtime sooner rather

than later, but you'll need to be a little patient while we get on top
of things :)

Cheers,
Barbie.
--
Birmingham Perl Mongers<http://birmingham.pm.org>
Memoirs Of A Roadie<http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>
CPAN Testers Blog<http://blog.cpantesters.org>
YAPC Conference Surveys<http://yapc-surveys.org>
Ark Appreciation Pages<http://ark.eology.org>

Reply via email to