>>>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:17:24 -0800, Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> >>>>> said:
> Here is the tl;dr version: Here's the "maybe too short" version once again, it's in the subject: Test::More 1.005000_002 (over)coverage. In other words: 1.005000_002 has been used on cpantesters more than enough. Once a module has received enough attention and has made enough noise, we can stop looking at it. Cpantesters need to focus on the next N bugs once they have clearly identified one. I do not agree with David that we need to kick out dev releases, I wholeheartedly welcome them. And I do not agree with you that an additional marker could solve the problem, because the additional marker is already there. It is widely visible that Test::More 1.005000_002 is a test release. I find the current system works quite well and needs no immediate change. The very rare cases that may be experienced as disturbing get posted here and can be addressed manually. The problem at hand is currently solvable in two ways: ask the author to withdraw his module or ask the cpantesters to ignore it. I chose the latter because it's harsh, rude, and counterproductive to tell an author to remove his work even if we know each other as well as we do. But feel free to consider withdrawing it without being asked:) -- andreas
