On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gabor Szabo <ga...@szabgab.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Andreas J. Koenig > <andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:50:08 +0200, Gabor Szabo <ga...@szabgab.com> >>>>>>> said: >> >> > Could someone (especially BinGOs), please take a look at this report: >> > >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/8396ba36-65c0-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5 >> >> > It seems to complain about two identical strings not being the same. >> >> > Any idea why would that happen? >> >> ^M >> >> You must download the report, not look at it in the browser. > > thanks. > > What I still don't understand is where have those ^M-es got there? > And why only on some systems? > > After downloading the report I saw that on some lines there were ^M in both > the expected and the actual, while on other lines only one of the > versions had the ^M > characters. > > Gabor
This is even weirder now. I got this report (on a new release of the same package) http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d26facd0-6b83-11e1-b4a3-91c8ad4f1d97 after $ wget http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d26facd0-6b83-11e1-b4a3-91c8ad4f1d97 opening the file with $ vim d26facd0-6b83-11e1-b4a3-91c8ad4f1d97 I don't see any ^M at all in this one. In the other one at least I could see the ^M-s. After removing the other parts of the mail the two strings seem to be the same (using diff). Am I lacking caffeine in my system? Gabor
