>>> Doing the -t will take care of all of the dependencies, won't it?
>>> Certainly seemed to when I was testing my script earlier.
> 
> Yes.

Ah, but for a different version of "yes" than I was thinking about.

I wasn't really paying attention as stuff scrolled by, just noticed that 
dependencies seemed to be "getting taken care of".
I thought they were getting installed regularly, not in the way you described.

So now I get Leo's point :-)

> Personally I find not installing things inefficient because you may have
> to build dependencies again and again.

Indeed.

> But one of the beauties of cpantesters is that everybody finds a different 
> way to do it so that we
> find different bugs.

As diplomatic as ever, Andreas ;-)

Neil

Reply via email to