Hi David,

I suspect this is a fault with the reader, as this hasn't been changed in
years. The RSS feeds are built from the full list as that was how some were
originally reading them, as opposed to the .json files. I could perhaps
reduce them to the last year or last 6 months, or an arbitrary number.

A question for all those who use the RSS feeds, how many entries would you
want to see?

Cheers,
Barbie.


-- 
Birmingham.pm - http://birmingham.pm.org
CPAN Testers - http://cpantesters.org
YAPC Surveys - http://yapc-surveys.org
Perl Jam - http://perljam.info


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:59 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com>wrote:

> Testers,
>
> Lately I have been seeing very old test reports appearing in my feed:
>
>   http://www.cpantesters.org/author/D/DWHEELER-nopass.rss
>
> An example:
>
> <title>FAIL Object-Relation-v0.1.0 5.8.3 on netbsd 1.6.2
> (i386-netbsd)</title>
> <link>
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/00340868-b19f-3f77-b713-d32bba55d77f
> </link>
> <description>FAIL Object-Relation-v0.1.0 5.8.3 on netbsd 1.6.2
> (i386-netbsd)</description>
> <guid isPermaLink="false">
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/00340868-b19f-3f77-b713-d32bba55d77f
> </guid>
> <pubDate>2006-08-04T03:45+01:00</pubDate>
> </item>
> <item>
> <title>FAIL DBD-Pg-1.22 5.8.0 on freebsd 4.7-release (i386-freebsd)</title>
> <link>
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/00103467-b19f-3f77-b713-d32bba55d77f
> </link>
> <description>FAIL DBD-Pg-1.22 5.8.0 on freebsd 4.7-release
> (i386-freebsd)</description>
> <guid isPermaLink="false">
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/00103467-b19f-3f77-b713-d32bba55d77f
> </guid>
> <pubDate>2003-09-28T14:25+01:00</pubDate>
> </item>
>
>
> I keep marking them as read, but they keep reappearing. Might be a bug in
> my reader, though it doesn't happen to any other feed. Of course, no other
> feed has such ancient dates in it.
>
> Do we really need to include *all* reports for all time in the feed? I
> would think maybe the last year’s worth would be sufficient.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>

Reply via email to