Em Tue, 27 Oct 2015 04:09:29 -0400 David Golden <x...@xdg.me> escreveu:
> > > Correct. I would rely on authors to provide a testrules.yml file. > Alright, I added/updated the following pages in the wiki with this information: http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes&version=51 http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANReporterSmokerFaster&version=3 http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/SmokeTesting&version=12 For the full changelog: http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/RecentChanges > > Also, such configuration will depend on having CPAN::Meta::YAML > > <http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?CPAN%3A%3AMeta%3A%3AYAML> > > available, but it seems that this distribution is not part of > > CPAN::Reporter or Task::CPAN::Reporter (but I found it as part of > > Bundle::CPANReporter2). Looks like a opportunity to a pull request > > to Task::CPAN::Reporter if you are willing to have it :-). Please > > let me know. > > > > > Sure! Done! https://github.com/dagolden/task-cpan-reporter/pull/2 > > > Is there any chance to to include such information in META.yml > > > > I'm not sure what you mean. Adding test harness rules? I don't think > that's a good idea. That's exactly the original idea. I use ExtUtils::MakeMaker for my distros and I thought it would be good and easy to just add that to Makefile.PL. But it seems ExtUtils::Makemaker doesn't play well with TAP::Harness. > Adding some metadata about whether the > distribution supports parallel testing? I have no objection to that, > but I think smokers should feel free to smoke with parallel testing > since end users can already do the same thing. I don't think that this would help that much. Besides, the author would need to be sure to configure correctly the tests execution and indicate if parallel testing is support in two different places. Regards, Alceu
