Hello Nigel,

Sorry to take a long time to answer, your e-mail was identified as SPAM by Yahoo! damn filter.


I commented your e-mail below...

Em 26-10-2015 12:28, Nigel Horne escreveu:

I use the TEST_JOBS and HARNESS_OPTIONS environment variables to
parallelize the testing that I do.

I'll take a look at TEST_JOBS (don't know about it) but right now I just disable HARNESS_OPTIONS: several modules were failing, some with weird results (like failing due missed dependencies but the dependencies were tested successfully and were installed!).

They do catch some errors, but be prepared to deal with authors who
disagree that it's their problem!


Honestly, in this case I think we introduced the errors. We can't think they will magically starting fixing their errors (or forcing sequential tests by using the proper configuration file) with distribution tests, specially because in some cases parallel execution is too difficult to implement.

Maybe we should at least change the report itself, making clear that the errors reported were due a parallel test execution. Not sure how easy it is to do it anyway, but checking all environment variables for a parameter doesn't help much. :-)

Reply via email to