Hello Kent, My apologies, but definitely something is wrong with my smoker, or at least it was. I double checked if "recommended" was installed, and it was not. Interesting enough, I got a report of PASS for it and my smoker is configured to automatically install all distros with that grade of testing. On the other side, your distribution is already installed. So my guess is that in some moment it was fixed, but I don't understand how come it got installed if "recommended" was not available. Here is some evidence: https://www.dropbox.com/s/hl1zqit68ir4dvy/2015-11-16%2007_38_04-CPAN%20OpenBSD%20%5BExecutando%5D%20-%20Oracle%20VM%20VirtualBox.png?dl=0 I'm copying this e-mail to the CPAN tester mailing list, maybe a good soul there already has some experience with cases like this. I'm clueless. Regards, Alceu De: Kent Fredric <kentfred...@gmail.com> Para: arfrei...@cpan.org Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 16 de Novembro de 2015 1:50 Assunto: Spurious test failures from your OpenBSD smokers I'm getting a lot of fail reports from your OpenBSD box, for instance:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6de22078-8b6d-11e5-841a-c79391aaabaa They all share the same thing in common: They have a broken installation of Dist::Zilla::Util:Test::KENTNL The version your reports claim to have installed is 1.005013 That version clearly dictates that `recommended` is a runtime requirement: https://metacpan.org/source/KENTNL/Dist-Zilla-Util-Test-KENTNL-1.005013/META.json#L125 And this basically means all my Dzil plugins are expected to fail in this way. As such your reports are in error for failing to satisfy prerequisites. Thanks. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
