On 5 September 2016 at 04:10, Slaven Rezic <sla...@rezic.de> wrote: >> >> Of course I can try to compile the interpreter without perlbrew, but that >> leads to the questions: are we looking for to validate CPAN modules against >> the interpreter shipped with OpenBSD or the standard perl? >> > > There's no "or". Both types of reports are valuable.
+1 Because we should expect software to run on system perls wherever system perls exist. Things that do not run are bugs, and must be fixed by avoiding the problem case in the code, or where that is impossible, resolving the breakage on the system perl. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
