Slaven would have to answer definitively, but fast-matrix isn't necessarily guaranteed to be accurate. It's not supposed to be. It's supposed to be fast. Matrix uses the fully-processed CPAN Testers data, which has been built to ensure that no data is lost between the Metabase and the website. Fast-matrix polls an API that displays the last 1000 reports (which opens it up to potentially missing data if a lot of data comes in too quickly). There's also the possibility that fast-matrix validates SSL to the Metabase and couldn't connect while the SSL cert for metabase.cpantesters.org <http://metabase.cpantesters.org/> was expired.
In short, it sounds normal to me, but Slaven would have to answer definitively. Doug Bell d...@preaction.me > On Jul 6, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Jean-Damien Durand <jeandamiendur...@free.fr> > wrote: > > Hello, > > I was expecting fast-matrix web page to always show at least the same number > of tests than non-fast matrix web-page, or more (i.e. fast-matrix includes > the results from log.txt not yet digested into non-fast matrix result). > Today if I compare e.g. > http://fast-matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=MarpaX-ESLIF%202.0.14 > <http://fast-matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=MarpaX-ESLIF%202.0.14> v.s. > http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=MarpaX-ESLIF%202.0.14 > <http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=MarpaX-ESLIF%202.0.14>, fast version > report is summarized to: > > > First report: 2017-06-27 08:38 UTC+2 (8 days ago) > Last report: 2017-07-06 05:25 UTC+2 (an hour ago) > PASS: 336 > NA: 1 > Number of tested configurations: 124 > > > while regular matrix summarizes to: > > > First report: 2017-06-27 08:16 CEST (8 days ago) > Last report: 2017-07-05 22:54 CEST (8 hours ago) > PASS: 414 > NA: 2 > UNKNOWN: 2 > Number of tested configurations: 131 > > So the question is... is that normal ? > > > Thanks, Regards, Jean-Damien. > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
