On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:41:15PM -0500, Allen Smith wrote:
> On Mar 26, 10:15pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:04:57PM -0500, Ed Allen Smith wrote:
> > > Trapping STDERR would be nice to reduce such noisiness... or is this
> > > something other than what I'm thinking?
> >
> > That is likely Test::Harness requiring 'wait.ph' to analyze a test
> > that tied (tests 22-26, 30-33 and 42-45 test tests that die) and the
> > resulting noise from h2ph being a little off. It looks like your copy
> > of wait.ph won't even compile.
>
> Actually, it seems to:
Sorry, actual error lies here:
eval 'sub _W_INT {
local($w) = @_;
eval "(*($w))";
}' unless defined(&_W_INT);
which WCOREDUMP calls which is called by Test::Harness.
> > Anyhow, this will supress the warnings. It's not really
> > Test::Harness's problem that h2ph is jittery.
>
> Well, no, although if it _isn't_ Test::Harness's problem, then I actually
> wouldn't want Test::Harness covering it up... I've included sys/wait.ph and
> sys/types.ph below, for any interested parties.
h2ph has firmed up a lot in current releases. Try running bleadperl's.
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
I'll tell you what beats voodoo every time, a big ass knife.
-- "Overkill" Battlebot driver
