[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo [Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:12:13AM +0200]: > This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers > effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible. See > http://testers.cpan.org/ > > Please cc any replies to [email protected] to keep other > test volunteers informed and to prevent any duplicate effort. > (...) > Thank you for uploading your work to CPAN. However, it appears that > there were some problems with your distribution.
Hi, Thanks a lot for this effort! However... Well, I'm baffled by the results: > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/perl5.005_05/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/test....Use of reserved word "our" is deprecated at > /mnt/i386/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Config-File-1.4-hUkREu/blib/lib/Config/File.pm > line 10. > Global symbol "$VERSION" requires explicit package name at > /mnt/i386/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Config-File-1.4-hUkREu/blib/lib/Config/File.pm > line 10. > Global symbol "@ISA" requires explicit package name at > /mnt/i386/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Config-File-1.4-hUkREu/blib/lib/Config/File.pm > line 10. > Global symbol "@EXPORT_OK" requires explicit package name at > /mnt/i386/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Config-File-1.4-hUkREu/blib/lib/Config/File.pm > line 10. > Compilation failed in require at t/test.t line 12. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/test.t line 12. > dubious > Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-11 > Failed 11/11 tests, 0.00% okay > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t/test.t 2 512 11 21 1-11 > Failed 1/1 test scripts. 11/11 subtests failed. > Files=1, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.02 CPU) > Failed 1/1 test programs. 11/11 subtests failed. > *** Error code 35 Umh... Ok, this might be related to the fact you seem to be building with an ancient version of Perl (5.005_05) - I haven't used that version in many years, but anyway... Does it not implement 'our' yet? I suppose the right way to solve this would be to add a 'require 5.006' line in my module, right? AFAICT, this (quite simple) module will not need any feature not present in 5.6. Please check if adding this line makes the build fail in a more successful way ;-) -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
