* David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> [2009-10-09T07:51:56]
> 21. Formalize optional_features
> 
> Proposal:
> 
> Optional features: is supported in META.yml, but it requires a lot of
> manual intervention and trickery to make it work. And it is very poorly
> documented. (Tux)

Either ditch optional_features or make its contents reflect the top-level
(build)_(requires)-like stuff.

Mostly I am opposed to optional features.

-- 
rjbs

Reply via email to