On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:21 -0500, "Graham Barr" <gb...@pobox.com> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:53 AM, David Golden wrote: > > > 24. Add a "release_status" field > > > > Proposal: > > > > Add a mandatory ''release_status'' field with a limited list of > > acceptable > > values. E.g. "stable", "testing" and "unstable", with "alpha" as an > > alias > > for "unstable" and "beta" as an alias for "testing". > > > > Have PAUSE use this field first to determine whether distributions > > should > > be indexed. (Eventually, have PAUSE create separate indexes "stable", > > "stable+testing", "stable+testing+unstable".) > > Is this not really trying to solve the same issue as CMSP 23. Have a > "development version" flag > > Graham.
I would say so, and it's a better solution, too. +1 --Curtis -- Curtis Jewell swords...@csjewell.fastmail.us %DCL-E-MEM-BAD, bad memory -VMS-F-PDGERS, pudding between the ears [I use PC-Alpine, which deliberately does not display colors and pictures in HTML mail] -- Curtis Jewell swords...@csjewell.fastmail.us %DCL-E-MEM-BAD, bad memory -VMS-F-PDGERS, pudding between the ears [I use PC-Alpine, which deliberately does not display colors and pictures in HTML mail]
