On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> wrote: > While perl6 is arguably a different language from perl5, > isn't perl5.10 arguably a different language from perl5.0? > > I don't object to a language field, but I think minimum version numbers, > no matter how major, belong elsewhere.
Through historical precedent, this already is in use: requires: perl: 5.006 I wouldn't have designed it that way, but CPAN/PLUS now handle it appropriately, so I say leave it alone. David