Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > > There's an interesting question about whether it's better to use > boost.python or SWIG. I've been using boost.python for years, so I > have a lot invested in it, but if I were starting from scratch, I > might consider using SWIG because it gives you the flexibility to > generate wrappers for languages other than Python. > > > On the other hand, SWIG generates ugly and inneficient code, at least > for the Python case. I'd like to see proof of the claim that SWIG's wrapper code is inefficient. In my experience it is not more inefficient than what, for example, boost.python via Py++ provides.
Paul _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
