On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Seefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Meine wrote:
>>
>> How about adding an id() method (returning this) to the C++ class and
>> exporting that?
>>
>
> Well, this 'id' isn't really a property of the wrapped type / object, but
> the wrapper. So, I think there is little sense in adding such a tautological
> 'id' function to the class itself. A free-standing
>
> type const *id(type const *t) { return t;}
>
> function would be more clean, IMO.
I think he wants size_t as return type:
template< class type >
size_t id( const type* t ){ return size_t( t ); }
class_< XXX >(....)
.def( "id", &id<XXX> );
Py++ has this and other functionality to allow better experience,
while exposing "C" libraries:
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/ctypes/ctypes_integration.html
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/ctypes/this_and_sizeof.html
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
