Dear Roman,
thank you very much for the suggested workaround. Could you answer the
additional questions below?
...
> > This indicated that the Test(char) constructor is applied although a string
> was given.
> > How can I solve the problem?
>
> Py++ doesn't help you here.
>
> > If possible only with module builder functions, without changes to the C
> > code?
>
> Partially. I suggest you to add few free functions and expose them:
>
> Test* create_test_from_char( char ){...}
> Test* create_test_from_string( std::string ){...}
> Test* create_test_from_char_array( const char* ){...}
>
> Thus you will not have to change your original code and the user code
> will be more "readable".
> There are few other alternatives, but I think you've got the idea.
Yes, with your suggestion I can at least work with the code.
But would you mind mentioning the other alternatives? My aim is to construct
the class like the "t=testmodule.Test("Hello")" above.
I was not able to use the suggested "create_*" functions as fake constructors
"test.add_fake_constructors( mb.calldefs( 'create_test_from_char' ) )". Do they
have to return an auto_ptr<Test> for this purpose?
Thank you
Werner
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
