Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I'm sure that it's the C++ code that's being called in both cases (I put a pdb.set_trace() in the Python code that shouldn't be called and a TRACE in the C++ code that should be called).
Some more information: - there are 148 calls to the function AddTangentAndBinormal(), 0.00625 s per call in the first case and 0.39 s per call in the second case). - in the case of a class, the instance is not persisted, i.e. the following python code is called 148 times: geom_utils = GeomUtils() geom_utils.AddTangentAndBinormal() - I'm using a std::map that will be filled with more than 10000 entries: it's a private member of the class in the first case and a global in the second case - I'm allocating about 10000 vector3 of float each call - I'm interacting with Panda3D game engine in this function Don't know if some of these additional info is useful... Thanks -David troy d. straszheim wrote: > > David Roy wrote: >> >> and the profile was back to 54.0 seconds!!! >> Please could someone help me understand what's the difference and the >> mechanism underlying that? > > Probably that you're not running the code that you think you are. There > should be no difference between member function and free function in > this case, unless you're not telling us something. Run python with the > -v option to be sure that the code you are running comes from where you > expect it to. > > -t > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cplusplus-sig mailing list > Cplusplus-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boost.Python%3A-wrapping-classes-instead-of-functions----tp25380730p25396895.html Sent from the Python - c++-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
