On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Christopher Bruns <cmbr...@stanford.edu> wrote: > Single-argument C++ constructors in pyplusplus seem to generate a > boost::python::implicitly_convertible tag, even when the constructor > is declared "explicit" in C++. That doesn't sound right to me.
I don't completely agree with you. > Shouldn't a pair of types that are not implicitly convertible in C++, > also not be implicitly convertible in python? It depends on your use cases. > I suspect I can manually adjust the implicitly_convertible tag > generation using the "allow_implicit_conversion" flag in pyplusplus. > Is there a way to tell pyplusplus to avoid generating an > implicitly_convertible tag for all explicit constructors? I don't think so. I attached gccxml generated file for your code. As you can see both constructors ( Foo and Bar ) have "explitic=1". So Py++ has no way to find out whether a constructor explicit or not. If such functionality would present, I think that the default would be the opposite. HTH -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/
1.tar.bz
Description: application/bzip
_______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
