On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:07 AM, peoro <peoro.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, having all of the objects at their most-derived type would be
> what I need, but it's not what happens.
>
> I posted a piece of C++ code that shows what I do (I exported it using
> py++ without any further modification): all of the pointers my
> functions return are wrapped in boost::shared_ptr's, but from Python I
> see them at the "derivation level" they were when I passed them to
> python the first time (look at the summarized output in my previous
> message)...
Can you check your code, but with the following class definition
class Base {
public:
virtual ~Base(){}
};
class Derived : public Base { };
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
