I'm wondering if this behavior is correct when using pygccxml. Consider the
following two sets of simple class definitions:
-------------- SET 1 ----------------------
class inner {
protected:
unsigned a;
unsigned b;
unsigned c;
};
class Cool {
public:
Cool(){}
protected:
int x;
int y;
int z;
inner i;
};
-------------- SET 2 ----------------------
class Cool {
public:
Cool();
protected:
class inner {
protected:
unsigned a;
unsigned b;
unsigned c;
};
int x;
int y;
int z;
inner i;
};
-------------- END ----------------------
So you'll notice that the only difference between 1 & 2 is that 2, defines
"inner" as an inner class. Now, if I parse a header file containing those
classes, obtain a reference to the pygccxml for class Cool and print it's
variables like so:
for var in classType.variables():
print "var", var.name, var.type
This is what I get:
SET 1
var x int
var y int
var z int
var i inner
SET 2
var x int
var y int
var z int
var i Cool::inner
var a unsigned int
var b unsigned int
var c unsigned int
As you can see, when I is an inner class, the inner class's members show up in
the parent class in addition to the inner class itself. Is this behavior
correct? In SET 2, I would not expect to see a, b, and c show up as members of
class Cool. If this behavior is correct, is there a way to filter out those
members that belong to the inner class?
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
