> I think  that's a fine idea. (My guess is that it didn't make it into the
> boost.python  API because it was added after the initial API had been 
>designed.)


That's exactly right. Boost.Python was developed when Python 2.2 had just come 
out. (Boost.Python 1 was even based on 1.5.2)

I'm not aware of plans for adding boost::python::set, but it would be a great 
addition.

Ralf
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig

Reply via email to