okay cool. I think that's a reasonable compromise. It should also (hopefully) make it possible to move away from the indexing suite as well.
thanks for your help! On 16 August 2011 21:41, Jim Bosch <tallji...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/16/2011 11:29 AM, Babak Khataee wrote: > >> Okay thanks for the info. >> >> Things are also a lot safer if you only wrap vectors as const; it's >> exposing the mutators to Python that gets really difficult. >> >> >> Is the const-ness of a wrapped object just a side effect of not exposing >> methods which modify it or is it due to something else more explicit ? >> > > The former. It's really only the methods that can invalidate iterators > (i.e. those that add or remove elements) that you need to worry about. > Non-const access to individual elements is totally safe on its own. > > Jim >
_______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
