On 10/05/2011 09:18 AM, Jim Bosch wrote:
>
> I have one (perhaps unusual) use case that's extremely important for
> me: I have a templated matrix/vector/array class, and I want to define
> converters between those types and numpy that work with any
> combination of template parameters. I can do that with compile-time
> converters, and after including the header everything just works.
> With runtime conversions, I have to explicitly declare all the
> template parameter combinations I intend to use.
Jim,
I may be a little slow here, but I still don't see the issue. You need
to export your classes to Python one at a time anyhow, i.e. not as a
template, letting the Python runtime figure out all valid template
argument permutations. So why can't the converter definitions simply be
bound to those type definitions ?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
