Hi Raghvendra,
I'll look at your tutorial shortly.
Are you the one responsible for maintaining / bug fixing for Boost.Python? Or
would I assume someone else will see my post and act on it? Actually, what I
want to know is how I report bugs to whomever will fix them.
Thanks.
Michael Rolle
(408) 313-8149
----- Original Message -----
From: Raghvendra Jain
To: Development of Python/C++ integration
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Bugs in the Boost.Python tutorial example
Hi Michael,
I had written a tutorial on Compiling Boost.Python using Visual Studio.
Please check.
http://www.sigverse.org/wiki/en/index.php?Compiling%20Boost.Python%20for%20Python%20in%20Visual%20Studio
I know I am not directly answering the questions you raised here, but I guess
it might help you since this method is working for me and several others.
My aim was to embed Python inside the C++ code, so that I can call Python
functions. I guess your aim is to call C++ functions from Python. Nevertheless,
the process of building the example, is not so different. Please let me know if
it helps.
I am running on a deadline, else I would have tried to find a concrete
solution to your issues. Sorry again.
Cheers,
Raghav
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Michael Rolle <m...@rolle.name> wrote:
Hi,
I had a hard time building the example/tutorial project. Some of this is,
I believe, due to bugs in the distribution, and some is probably my lack of
understanding.
Some of this I posted to the Boost interest group before I could join this
(Python C++) SIG, hoping it would get forwarded on here, so there may be a
duplication.
1. Calling bjam in the example/tutorial project failed to even start up the
build system. This was because the example/bootstrap.jam pointed to the wrong
path for the build system root. Instead of ../../../tools/build/v2, it should
be ../../../tools/build/src/kernel. When I changed this, bjam now got past the
build system startup.
2. Building the project not only compiles hello.cpp, but it also builds a
private copy of the Boost/Python library. So I needed to supply the properties
needed to correctly build this library (i.e., link=shared, address-mode=64).
Of course, I needed to supply those same properties anyway as part of creating
the extension.
There's probably a way to change something so that the extension uses the
library built in the Boost.Python's own project, or if I have obtained the
libraries without having to build them, it would use these. I don't know if
you intended to have the tutorial example make its own copies, but it seems a
waste of resources to do so.
3. The link for debug mode failed, saying that the .pdb file was in the
wrong format (LNK1207). This is a bug, due to an option in the link command
'/IMPORTLIB:...hello_ext.pdb'. So the linker is creating the .pdb file as an
import library, then complaining that it's not a valid pdb file. I changed
'.pdb' to '.lib'. I could also have removed this option entirely, since
hello_ext.pyd doesn't have anything to export anyway.
4. Before figuring out that the link was the problem, I changed the /Z7
argument to /Zi in the compile command for hello.cpp. I don't know if this was
necessary, or if it was necessary to leave it in place. For now, I just wanted
to get it to build. Without /Z7, the debug symbols go into
example/tutorial/vc120.pdb. I don't know if the linker found these or not.
When I try stepping into the extension, I'll know for sure. Microsoft prefers
that .pdb files be used for debug symbols rather than embedding them in the
.obj files, so this might be the only real reason to make the change.
4. The link for both release mode failed with two undefined symbols,
__imp_DecodePointer and __imp_EncodePointer, which are in kernel32.lib. I
tried adding kernel32.lib to the link's inputs. But then it warned that there
could be static constructors/destructors not getting called. After much
research on this topic, I found that the source of the problem was the /NOENTRY
argument in the link command, which has the consequence that the automatic CRT
initialization of the DLL doesn't occur. So I remove the /NOENTRY and got not
warnings, and I didn't need to add kernerl32.lib either.
5. A minor point. The MACHINE:X64 is redundant. The linker knows it's X64
because of the architecture of the input files and libraries. Nothing wrong
with it being there, but it's just clutter in the code.
6. Now bjam was successful in building whatever it wanted to build. It
said that hello.test passed. Sounds great, I thought. But I then went into
Python and tried 'import hello_ext' and that failed. So I have an issue with
the test program passing, while the extension didn't actually work.
7. The problem was that bjam didn't put the hello_ext.pyd file in my
Python's lib/site-packages folder. It built the .pyd and .pdb files in the
example/tutorial/bin/... staging area, and copied (ONLY) the .pyd file to
example/tutorial. So not only did the .pyd file get put in the wrong place,
but the .pdb was left out. If I am going to debug my extension (such as with
Visual Studio's Python Tools), the .pdb file also needs to be in the
lib/site-packages folder. Without the .pdb file, the PTVS debugger will not
set breakpoints or step into the extension code.
To summarize, the fixes I made in order to build the example and use it in
Python were:
* Change the build system path in examples/bootstrap.jam.
* Change the /IMPORTLIB:....pdb to ....lib in the link command. I
could have removed it altogether.
* Remove /NOENTRY from the link command.
* Manually copy the example/tutorial/bin/.../hello_ext.(pyd,pdb) files
to Python's lib/site-packages.
This cost me about a whole day's time, and I'm pretty resourceful. And I
actually want to build my own extensions in VS instead of bjam, linking to the
Boost.Python DLL. I started of by trying this, and my extension crashed. So
that's why I went about building the example with bjam, to at least see what a
successful deployment looked like. But I'll still have to figure out what went
wrong with my original attempt; there may be additional bugs to report.
I suppose that a lot of people would have given up building the tutorial
example and then given up on Boost.Python altogether.
Michael Rolle
(408) 313-8149
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
