Dean Michael Berris wrote: > Hi John, > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:56 PM, John P. Feltz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't see any compelling reason for either git vs svn or sf vs github. >> I only see a time cost that would be better spent on actually improving >> the library. Merging in SVN from what I've seen is fairly trivial, it is >> the design decisions that are hard -and those can be addressed through >> work on the specs and subsequent division between Dean and myself >> (currently). >> >> > > I am not sure where the division is though. What I have stated before > about how to go forward has been clear in both my mind and the code > I've written. The tests are the specification for what features I'm > looking for in a header-only URI library. > Testing code is fine, however among other benefits, a document is easier to use for reaching consensus prior to coding (a much more laborious process without that).
> Let me know how I can close the division from my end. > I was referring to the benefit of a clear division of labor that documents and people help establish. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
