On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Nelson, Erik - 2 <[email protected]> wrote: > Dean Michael Berris wrote: >> I think it's because vendors aren't quick to support them natively in >> the compiler. GCC takes this in stride just fine as does other >> vendors (Intel's compiler is another one I know that works pretty >> well). I would quote the appropriate parts of the C++ standard if I >> had a copy (which I promise I should buy someday soon) but anyway >> it's something really annoying to me for non-conformant compilers >> like MSVC. >> >> I also like them better but unfortunately to support more compilers >> we're going to have to stick with !, ||, && et al. > > I'd say just put #include <ciso646> up high and continue to use them. > They are standard C++, and they're much more descriptive than the !&&#|| > stuff. Don't cave in to the noncompliant compiler vendors! >
Yeah, I suppose that would work. ;) -- Dean Michael Berris cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/deanberris linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
