On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Glyn Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> On 10 June 2010 13:27, Dean Michael Berris <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions or if you have better ideas on
>> how to make this a little less repetitive (the overloads). I'm not
>> opposed to doing template metaprogramming -- on the contrary I would
>> love it more if there was a cleaner way for doing the refactoring.
>
> I can't comment yet on this, but I'm getting so many compilation failures I
> don't even know where to start (Linux, GCC 4.4.3).  It seems there are some
> missing headers (for sure
> boost/network/protocol/http/message/message_base.hpp).

Ack! I'll fix that. My bad, I was avoiding checking in my work in
progress on the asynchronous stuff. Let me check in a dirty
implementation that should allow the thing to compile.

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
deanberris.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel

Reply via email to