Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
FYI, gives food for thought.
I have asked the report's author how the selection of tools to test was
made.
It sais that it is five tolls used in the swedish administraton.
FYI: episerver and polypoly re popular tools in sweden. We fought with
them alot with EasyPublisher, and lost. Not becaus ethey are good, but
becuase they have good sales people, and we didn't. ;)
Epi server is some ASP-junk, I think, and polypoly is php. All most or
less just the ordinary "take data from with an SQL-query, and stuff it
into the tenplate" type of thingies. nothing special, really. But hugely
expensive of course. :rolleyes:.
It would be interesting to see how well CPS would performed in a
similar setting.
Yup. I've looked a bit on this test, and most of it it conforming to
WCAG (which we do, I hope) and to ATAG, which I had never heard of. It
seems to be a WCAG for content *authoring*.
It should also work well with what they call "the 24-hour web". This
seem sto be guidelines for how the swedish administration should go
about setting up websites.
It's 111 pages long, so I haven't read it yet. :-) But the part about
CMS system conformance seems basically to just be ATAG again. So,
pretty much, if we confirm to WCAG and ATAG (which we probably don't)
then we'll come high in this test.
It's good that Plone comes up high, then CPS should come high too, we
confirm to standards about the same.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
