Hi David, David Pratt wrote: > Hi. I am just checking out the nuxeo.lucene (ZPL) package but noticed a > dependency on nxlucene (LGPL) for two imports in catalog.py: > > around line 37: > > from nxlucene.rss.resultset import ResultSet > from nxlucene.rss.adapter import PythonResultSet > > The nxlucene.rss package is a small package with no dependencies on > nxlucene.
Yes. This is a NXLucene package dependency.
> I would very appreciate it if this package could be brought into the
> nuxeo.lucene package so that there are no parts that are not ZPL - since
> I work with ZPL pretty much exclusively.
right. I don't see any blocker for that.
> Alternatively, if this sub package is needed by both packages, perhaps
> it could be split out under the ZPL so it could remain in common without
> affecting the license of nuxeo.lucene.
yes. this is the thing to do but you'll do the package split your self
:) Do you have an svn account ?
> Of course, it would be great if you could consider ZPL for nxlucene also
> - to make these two packages consistently licensed - which would also
> make me a happy camper. :-)
Nope. NXLucene will remain under the LGPL.
Cheers,
J.
--
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
Open Source ECM - http://www.nuxeo.com
Nuxeo 5 : http://www.nuxeo.org
Mobile: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cps-devel mailing list http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
