Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
> Julien Anguenot wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>>  
>>> Julien Anguenot wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>>>>       
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>  
>>>> Has your PyLucene 2.x branch finally been merged on trunk for
>>>> NXLucene ?
>>>>       
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>  
>>> not yet been merged as I see, by the way the thread patch can be
>>> removed. pylucene2 has it already (I'm going to check in the change).
>>>     
>>
>> for the patch, I backported it from the 2.x branch at that time when
>> they introduced it. So yes useless right now.
>>
>>     J.
>>
>>   
> 
> OK, I've just removed it. BTW there is one test that fails, it says:

ok.

> class LuceneServerTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
>    def test_reindexing(self):
>    ....
>        # Reindexing just one field cleares unstored fields. This is a known
>        # problem with Lucene, for which we have no solution at the moment.
>        # So the following test which demonstrates this) is currently
>        # commented out.
>        ## Search o2 on fulltext (no return fields)
>        res = self._server.searchQuery(return_fields=(),
>                                       search_fields=({'id' : u'fulltext',
>                                                       'value':
> u'object2'},))
> 
>        res = PythonResultSet(ResultSet(res)).getResults()[0]
>        self.assertEqual(res, ({u'uid': u'2'},),)
> 
> should it be commented out as it says in the comment?

Yes, this is a Lucene limitation related to document updates and
unstored fields. AFAIK, there is no workaround yet for this...

        J.


-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
Open Source ECM - http://www.nuxeo.com
Nuxeo 5 : http://www.nuxeo.org
Mobile: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel

Reply via email to