On May 19, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Racinet Georges a écrit :
On May 12, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Thanks, I've finally backported some fixes for StorageAdapter,
which was overwriting too many fields during a document update.
There is a remaining bug with DiskFile, even on CPS 3.4.8.
Thanks for the report, Christophe.
Such detailed issue should belong int the trac : http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub
(log in as tracguest/tracguest)
If you eventually have a patch for this, I'd be glad to check it in.
Christophe
Wow, I remember those fixes, one of the last generic work on CPS
I've done as a Nuxeo employee,
The primary goal was to avoid useless writes in LDAP backing
directories, while still being able to update a meta directory
upstairs (for CPS specific fields that would be stored in another
- ZODB - backing).
Did you backport this on your project for directories or
documents ? I've always wondered what the overall (positive, I
hope) performance impact in the case of documents would be, and
never had a chance to measure that. Any numbers to share ?
I've backported it for CPSDocuments, to avoid dataloss with
DiskFile objects overwriting an already published file. This is
not related to performance so I didn't measure anything.
Cheers,
--
Georges Racinet, http://www.racinet.fr
Zope/CPS/Plone expertise, assistance & development
GPG: 0x4862FFF7
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
--
Georges Racinet, http://www.racinet.fr
Zope/CPS/Plone expertise, assistance & development
GPG: 0x4862FFF7
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
