Le 30.08.2010 20:42, Racinet Georges a écrit : > > While it's rather clear that CPS is really not up to the current > standards of the Python and Zope worlds, it's amazing that it still has > a good reputation among those that have experienced developing with it. > > By « current standards », I mean at least Zope 2.12 or ZTK on python > 2.6, setuptools/distribute packaging, zc.buildout or virtualenv support, > and of course the WSGI goodness that comes with that. > This is a bit sad, especially if one remembers a few typical Zope 3 > concepts have actually been inspired by ancestors from CPS. > > Porting to a recent Zope or ZTK version would certainly be a big work. > I'm most probably the only one around working almost full time around > CPS, but gathering half a dozen contributors with more limited time > dedication looks feasible from my point of view, and that'd make the > project more than a wish. > > There are lots of open questions, technical and organisational. Maybe > it's the right time to start discussing them in the open. > > Sooo… who's interested ? > In particular, what would bother you with the idea ? Stating the other > way round : what would be the breakthrough to get you in ? No commitment > asked at this point. >
Sadly I haven't the time to investigate the "current standards" because I'm only working on CPS part-time. So what I can do is participate in lifting the CPS products up to the current standards once a migration plan has been decided. Basically what I did for the Unicode migration :-) Cheers, -- Marc-Aurèle DARCHE AFUL http://aful.org/ Association Francophone des Utilisateurs de Logiciels Libres French speaking Libre Software Users' Association _______________________________________________ cps-devel mailing list http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
