Hi Julien,

I wish you and the nuxeo team a happy new year.

I'm feeling good in my role as a guinea pig of CPS 3.4.

I rebuilt everything in  portal_trees but it didn't change the status.

Almost all menue items are duplicated, but not all.

In the "session" box nothing is duplicated.
In the "language selector" box nothing is dupilcated.

In the "user actions" box
   logout
   my stuff
are not duplicated.

In the "portal actions" box
   Reconfigure Portal
   Portal Themes

are not duplicated.

Anyone curious enough can login to
http://www.wortklang.net/portals/cps_03/collaboration

with
username:cpsmailinglist
password:cpsmailinglist

as a CPS instance manager.

It's a purely experimental CPS instance and is mounted on a separate Data.fs, so be free to smash it.

Cheers.

Aroldo.




Julien Anguenot schrieb:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aroldo Souza-Leite wrote:
Hi list,

I'm a beginner as a CPS "configuration worker".
I'm working on CPS-3.3.8.1  (congratulations to the nuxeo team!).

The boxes appear double in the default configuration, so I just deleted
the root boxes, keeping only the CPSSkins boxes.

But why do the menue items appear double inside the boxes?  How can I
delete the duplicated entries?


You can try out to rebuild the tree caches in portal_trees. Keep us
posted about the result please.

Keep in mind that 3.3.x is a devel branch so we are still refactoring a
bit until the first 3.4 beta release.

Cheers.

        J.
- --
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org
Zope3 / ECM   : http://www.z3lab.org
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDxagAGhoG8MxZ/pIRApLVAJ9+7JQ5NYhQz1m3pse9oqHrHTdiPACcClv5
wdFMaPKwwzp8rDogMNtL9aY=
=CGDF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
cps-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-users

Reply via email to