On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Reese wrote:
> It acknowledges the existence of common law. Now that this has been cleared
> up, your contention is that the US is not bound by, and does not follow ANY
> of the precepts of English common law, is that correct?
No, Reese, that isn't my contention.
____________________________________________________________________
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the final precedence since it's the primary authority?
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
