At 09:05 PM 4/17/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:

>Isn't the anonymizing agent itself a 'reputation service' in that it's
>reputation capital is 'anonymity'?

Completely orthogonal to the reputations (or lack thereof) of its clients, 
yes, a so-called anonymizer has a reputation, actually, several (e.g.,
uptime; 
resistance to subpeonae; mean time to handle user gripes; etc).

And the point is? 



 






  




Reply via email to