Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 22:16:34 -0400
To: Matthew Gaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Ian Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plausible Explanation of RF Incidental Casualties
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Since this EMP scenario is supported by numerous witnesses
accounts, more of the evidence supports this scenario:



WAS FLIGHT 800 FELLED BY AN ELECTROMAGNETIC-PULSE WARHEAD?

How could so many witnesses see a missile intercept Flight 800
and yet the only evidence found suggests that an electrical surge,
not a missile, ignited the center fuel tank? Could there be a war-
head designed to destroy aircraft with a powerful electromagnetic
pulse (EMP) that would only leave evidence of an electrical surge?
Looking for the answer at the Library of Congress I found it...

The US Navy began developing a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) warhead
for antiaircraft missiles ten years ago and was test firing them
two years before the Flight 800 crash. An MHD warhead kills an
aircraft by burning out its circuits with a powerful electrical
surge induced by a electromagnetic pulse (EMP) from the warhead
detonating near the aircraft. The systems from Flight 800 were
riddled with evidence of a powerful electronic surge. In fact,
the official cause was declared to be an inexplicable surge
strong enough to put a spark into the center fuel tank.

Goddard's Journal introduces and explores the theory that Flight
800 was downed by a missile equipped with an EMP warhead, offering
an explanation for both eyewitness testimony and physical evidence.
The report is replete with photographic evidence and an animation:

EMP-warhead theory: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/twa-emp.htm

**************************************************************************
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week)
Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229
(614) 313-5722  ICQ: 106212065   Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/
**************************************************************************

Reply via email to