On Sun, 20 May 2001, Charles Farley wrote:
> The dissemination of an SSN does not contribute an idea, there is no speech
> content behind it. If it advances a compelling interest, in this case
> individual privacy, it seems to me a pretty good idea to restrict
> disclosure.
Please point to the statements in the 1'st that bring those issues into
'...make no law...'? Publishing them is clearly 'press'.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
They're on the public payroll...
"When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself public
property."
Thomas Jefferson
--
____________________________________________________________________
"...where annual election ends, tyranny begins;"
Thomas Jefferson & Samuel Adams
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
