Greg Broiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SF Daily Journal, a newspaper for the legal industry, had a cover story
> on Friday's paper discussing the Justicefiles.org case - not much new
> information, except that "someone" set up an anti-justicefiles site,
> including mug shots of the two creators of Justicefiles, a picture of their
> attorney and her "domestic partner", and their SSNs and other personal
> data. An attorney for Kirkland assured the reporter that the police
> officers acting as plaintiffs in the suit were devotees of law and order
> and certainly wouldn't be involved in anything like setting up the anti- site.
>
> I can't seem to find the anti- site using Google - anyone know the URL?
It's very seldom up. According to the Sierra Times article, Bill
Sheehan has been successful at getting the site pulled down due to
content that violates AUPs. If the person who's putting up the site
obtained her information legally as Sheehan has done, the site would
have a lot more persistence. But then she wouldn't have a need to
upload the site data from such places as Kinko's and internet cafes
and libraries.
> Also, it looks to me like Justicefiles may be experiencing some form of DNS
> cache poisoning attack (or perhaps something else) - if I try to look at
> www.justicefiles.org using my browser, I end up at 24.114.30.211; but if I
> do a nslookup on www.justicefiles.org after pointing nslookup or dig to the
> nameservers listed in justicefiles.org's WHOIS record (216.9.7.35), I get
> 216.9.7.36 instead.
It appears from what Declan McCullagh wrote this weekend to be a more
complicated story than that. Take a look at:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02044.html
> I have a feeling the FBI won't be hot on the trail of this hacking attempt.
*snicker*
