>David Honig wrote:
>
>>  Truth is a defense in the US for
>>  slander.  Do these girls want
>>  their medical records subpeona'd?
>
>As it is for libel, which may be the case here.  ("Slander" is spoken,
>"libel" is written.)  However, I don't think the courts would allow
>discovery in such a case.  Either the alleged libeler can prove his
>statement ab initio or he is guilty.  If the courts allowed discovery, it
>would be used as a backdoor technique to conduct fishing expeditions into
>anyone's private life.

        Billy Clinton.
-- 
--
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
It is one of the essential features of such incompetence that the person so
afflicted is incapable of knowing that he is incompetent. To have such
knowledge would already be to remedy a good portion of the offense.
           

Reply via email to