At 09:29 PM 06/11/2001 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote: >As so many have pointed out, privately. >I was referring to a time before the media was uhm...expatriciated. > >Anybody care to cast a lot for their picks of Net/new media written in the >spirit of gentil intellection? John's writing may lead to some speculation about whether he did a little too much James Joyce in the 60s, but it's worth reading a much higher fraction of the time than most Internet writers, and when he's making stuff up it's almost always creative and interesting. On the other hand, it's less clear whether *you're* asking about people who write in a gently intellectual spirit or whether you're talking about goyish intellectuals here...
- No Subject smoke9330
- No Subject smoke9330
- No Subject Anonymous
- RE: (on Young's "private language") Aimee Farr
- RE: (on Young's "private language") David Honig
- RE: (on Young's "private language"... Jim Choate
- RE: (on Young's "private language&... David Honig
- RE: (on Young's "private language"... Aimee Farr
- Re: (on Young's "private language") Ken Brown
- RE: (on Young's "private language"... Aimee Farr
- RE: (on Young's "private language&... Bill Stewart
- RE: (on Young's "private lang... Aimee Farr
- No Subject Nomen Nescio
- No Subject Justin Smith
- No Subject keyser-soze
- No Subject Chris
- No Subject kolio ivanov
- No Subject 0nzWRXon1
- No Subject owner-cypherpunks
- No Subject owner-cypherpunks
- No Subject owner-cypherpunks
